IRODALOM

BLUM, A. & GUÉRIN-PACE, F. (2000): Des lettres et des chiffres. Des tests d’intelligence à l’évaluation du „savoir lire”, un siècle de polémiques. Fayard, Paris,

BROWN, G; MICKLEWRIGHT, J.; SCHNEPF, S. V. & WALDMANN, R. (2005): Cross-national surveys of learning achievement: how robust are the findings?, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1652.

CARVALHO, L. M. & COSTA, E. (2014): Seeing education with one’s own eyes and through PISA lenses: considerations ont he reception of PISA in European countries. Institue of Education, University of Lisbon, Lisbon.

CSÜLLÖG, K.,MOLNÁR, D. É. & LANNERT, J. (2014): A tanulók matematikai teljesítményét befolyásoló motívumok és stratégiák vizsgálata a 2003-as és 2012-es PISA-mérésekben. In: Hatások és különbségek, Oktatási Hivatal, Budapest.

Education at a Glance 2010. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.

FROESE-GERMAIN, B. (2010): The OECD, PISA and the Impact on Educational Policy. Virtual Research Centre. Canadian Teachers’ Federation. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532562.pdf. Letöltés ideje: 2015. június 7.

GOLDSTEIN, H. (2004): International comparisons of student attainment: some issues arising from the PISA study.In: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, vol. 11, No. 3,  pp. 319-330.

HOPMANN, T. S. & BRINEK, G. (2007): Introduction: PISA According to PISA – Does PISA Keep What Promises?, LIT Verlag Vienna, Berlin.

KREINER, S. (2010): Is the foundation under PISA solid? A critical look at the scaling model underlying international comparisons of student attainment. Dept. of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

MOLNÁR, Gy. (2005): Az objektív mérés lehetősége: a Rasch-modell. Iskolakultúra,   március pp. 71-80.

MONS, N., PONS, X.; VAN ZANTEN, A. & POUILLE, J. (2009): The reception of PISA in France. Knowledge and Regulation of the Educational System. KNOWandPOL http://knowandpol.eu/IMG/pdf/o31.pisa.france.pdf. Letöltés ideje: 2015. június 7.

MORTIMORE, P. (2009). Alternative Models for Analysing and Representing Countries’ Performance in PISA. Brussels. [Expert paper commissioned by the Education International Research Institute] http://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/Alternative%20Models%20in%20PISA.pdf. Letöltés ideje: 2015. június 7.

PISA 2009 Results (2011): Students on Line. Digital Technologies and Performance– Volume VI, OECD, Paris.

BALÁZSI, I., OSTORICS, L., SZALAI, B., SZEPESI, I. & VADÁSZ, Cs. (2013): PISA 2012 : Összefoglaló jelentés. Oktatási Hivatal, Budapest.

RUBIN, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in sample surveys.: John Wiley, New York.

RUTKOWSKI, L.; GONZALES, E.; JONCAS, M. & VON DAVIER, M. (2010): International large-Scale Assessment Data: issues in Secondary Analysis and Reporting. Educational Researcher, vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 142–151.

SJOBERT, S. (2012): PISA: Politics, fundamental problems and intriguing results. English manuscript. La Revue, Recherches en Education. No. 14. http://www.uhr.no/documents/6b_Sjoberg_PISA_English_La_Revue_no_20.03..pdf. Letöltés ideje: 2015. június 7.

SAHLBERG, P. (2008). Real Learning First: Accountability in a Knowledge Society. Paper prepared for the Alberta Teachers’ Association conference on Leadership in Educational. Accountability: Sustaining Professional Learning and Innovation in Alberta Schools, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, April 18-19.  www.pasisahlberg.com/downloads/Real%20Learning%20First%20FINAL.pdf Letöltés ideje: 2015. április 15.

WUTTKE, J. (2007): Uncertainties and Bias in PISA. In: PISA zufolge PISA – PISA According to PISA. Halt PISA, was es verspricht? Does PISA Keep What it Promises? Ed.:.HOPMANN, S.T.; BRINEK, G. & RETZL, M. Reihe Schulpadagogik und Padagogische Psychologie, Bd.6. Lit-Verlag, Wien.

YAMAMOTO, K. (2002): Estimating PISA students on the IALS prose literacy scale. Educational Testing Service.  Citeseer.